This HTML5 document contains 75 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Subject Item

n64:

n38:

n2:

Subject Item

n9:

n30:

n2:

Subject Item

n60:

n38:

n2:

Subject Item

n44:

n8:

n2:

Subject Item

n55:

n38:

n2:

Subject Item

n70:

n38:

n2:

Subject Item

n37:

n38:

n2:

Subject Item

n25:

n26:

n2:

Subject Item

n2:

rdfs:label

Fallacy Fallacy

rdfs:comment

A fallacy is an incorrect argument. A fallacy may be incorrect in: * deriving a conclusion which does not necessarily follow from the hypotheses; * inadequately explaining the conclusion's relation to the hypotheses, even if it does follow from them; * coming to a dumbass conclusion. A logical fallacy identifies a particular type of mistaken reasoning. It is important to study fallacies in order to be able to refute poor reasoning used by others and to be able to avoid using the same oneself. If one avoids logical fallacies, then one's arguments should be valid. If the premises of one's valid arguments are true, then one's conclusions should be true. When a female party-goer defends herself after being sexually assaulted, killing her attacker, Detectives Benson and Stabler attempt to support the girl's claim of self-defense. However, the case takes a shocking turn when they learn a startling secret about their victim. In the end, she was found guilty and was sent to Rikers before sentencing. She was however gang raped and rushed into emergency surgery. From [[w:|]][[Category: derivations|Fallacy]] < [[w:|]][[Category: derivations|Fallacy]] fallace < [[w:|]][[Category: derivations|Fallacy]] fallacia (“‘deception, deceit’”) < fallax (“‘deceptive, deceitful’”) < fallere (“‘to deceive’”). Logical Fallacies are when reasoning goes bad. Or, more formally said: A fallacy is a mistake in reasoning which can, yet doesn't have to, lead to a false conclusion. Let's divide the fallacies of reasoning into two groups: 1. * "Classical" logical fallacies 2. * Rhetorical tricks Example for a classical logical fallacy: <hr> Example for a fallacy as a rhetorical trick: One thing to keep in mind, is that even if someone is using a fallacy, it does not necessarily mean that their argument is not true. It merely means that they are attempting to argue for it improperly. These are the examples that apply to this Wiki, with the original list written by Endless Mike:

owl:sameAs

dbr:Fallacy

n29:

4

dcterms:subject

n13: n27: n33: n35: n39: n43: n45: n47: n49: n50: n56: n59: n72:

n3:

Dominance

n23:

April

n19:

n20:

n10:

Cheryl Avery.jpg

n68:

Fallacy

n69:

SVU

n67:

21

n61:

E3117

n58:

4

n48:

2003

n18:

18

n31:

n32:

n40:

Futility

n15:

n16: n32:

n6:wikiPageUsesTemplate

n7: n11: n24: n28: n34: n36: n41: n42: n51: n52: n54: n62: n63: n65: n66:

n4:wikiPageUsesTemplate

n5: n53:

n8:

n9:

n71:

Fallacy

n57:

Law & Order: Special Victims Unit

n46:

Fallacy

n38:

SVU

n30:

n44:

n14:abstract

One thing to keep in mind, is that even if someone is using a fallacy, it does not necessarily mean that their argument is not true. It merely means that they are attempting to argue for it improperly. These are the examples that apply to this Wiki, with the original list written by Endless Mike: A fallacy is an incorrect argument. A fallacy may be incorrect in: * deriving a conclusion which does not necessarily follow from the hypotheses; * inadequately explaining the conclusion's relation to the hypotheses, even if it does follow from them; * coming to a dumbass conclusion. When a female party-goer defends herself after being sexually assaulted, killing her attacker, Detectives Benson and Stabler attempt to support the girl's claim of self-defense. However, the case takes a shocking turn when they learn a startling secret about their victim. In the end, she was found guilty and was sent to Rikers before sentencing. She was however gang raped and rushed into emergency surgery. A logical fallacy identifies a particular type of mistaken reasoning. It is important to study fallacies in order to be able to refute poor reasoning used by others and to be able to avoid using the same oneself. If one avoids logical fallacies, then one's arguments should be valid. If the premises of one's valid arguments are true, then one's conclusions should be true. From [[w:|]][[Category: derivations|Fallacy]] < [[w:|]][[Category: derivations|Fallacy]] fallace < [[w:|]][[Category: derivations|Fallacy]] fallacia (“‘deception, deceit’”) < fallax (“‘deceptive, deceitful’”) < fallere (“‘to deceive’”). Logical Fallacies are when reasoning goes bad. Or, more formally said: A fallacy is a mistake in reasoning which can, yet doesn't have to, lead to a false conclusion. Let's divide the fallacies of reasoning into two groups: 1. * "Classical" logical fallacies 2. * Rhetorical tricks Example for a classical logical fallacy: <hr> Example for a fallacy as a rhetorical trick: