This HTML5 document contains 4 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/pvx/property/
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/T5W9cSnYD8PAayoA0a22nw==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/SS0DEmCrrqqzeERMQlgn1Q==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
PvXwiki talk:Requests for Build Master Status/Anonimous.
rdfs:comment
This will turn into a big flame war between people who have kept their eyes open and people who thinks he's a random scrub who hasn't proven any in-game knowledge. -- 05:19, 16 February 2009 (EST) You forgot the people who just don't care. - Image:Miserysig.PNG (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2009 (EST) I don't think they'll pick a side in the "BM or not?" argument. -- 05:26, 16 February 2009 (EST) You also forgot that Auron doesn't really care what the votes are on RfBMs and RfAs. - Image:Panic sig7.gif 05:27, 16 February 2009 (EST) That's another thing I wanted to find out. -- 05:28, 16 February 2009 (EST) By being brave and starting an RfBM for Anonimous or by implying you were going to bait people who voted against Anonimous? :> - Image:Panic sig7.gif 05:30, 16 February 2009 (EST)
n5:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n6:
n4:abstract
This will turn into a big flame war between people who have kept their eyes open and people who thinks he's a random scrub who hasn't proven any in-game knowledge. -- 05:19, 16 February 2009 (EST) You forgot the people who just don't care. - Image:Miserysig.PNG (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2009 (EST) I don't think they'll pick a side in the "BM or not?" argument. -- 05:26, 16 February 2009 (EST) You also forgot that Auron doesn't really care what the votes are on RfBMs and RfAs. - Image:Panic sig7.gif 05:27, 16 February 2009 (EST) That's another thing I wanted to find out. -- 05:28, 16 February 2009 (EST) By being brave and starting an RfBM for Anonimous or by implying you were going to bait people who voted against Anonimous? :> - Image:Panic sig7.gif 05:30, 16 February 2009 (EST) The reason behind me not RfBM'ing him was me being unsure if it's a good decision or not. I expect to see quite the lot of people on the oppose side, mostly pvpers, but wth. -- 05:33, 16 February 2009 (EST)