This HTML5 document contains 7 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/gH9655wFzfHHRAiuevDFtg==
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/PFAs7uclPB1ndPOTiA4iFQ==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/1KAq1H9xMOKRwf-VBADbkQ==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/TwiHdkoqqeG-PZh1z4NoxA==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/STCISockk42pRVhFM-0mLg==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/runescapefanfiction/property/
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
RuneScape Fan Fiction:Image of the Month/Feb08
rdfs:comment
Man, I don't even know the directory, I'll just say it's the little picture in the inforbox. Why did I choose it? Dunno, half because it's good artwork and the other just to get a new picture on the front page. All for? --Fegaxeyl 20:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC) Voting: Support: 0 Neutral: 0 Oppose: 0
n4:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n5: n7: n8: n9:
n6:abstract
Man, I don't even know the directory, I'll just say it's the little picture in the inforbox. Why did I choose it? Dunno, half because it's good artwork and the other just to get a new picture on the front page. All for? --Fegaxeyl 20:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC) Voting: Support: 0 Neutral: 0 Oppose: 0 Support - Assuming you mean Smallbookoleet.jpg, I think it looks really good. It really looks like it would be an actual item, while other items (like the Money rune in my signature) obviously look fake. Image:Saradomin Dragon Chain (g).pngChiafriend12Image:Money rune.png 03:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)