This HTML5 document contains 10 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Subject Item

n2:

rdfs:label

Duke lacrosse case

rdfs:comment

You can use the box below to create new pages for this mini-wiki. preload=Duke lacrosse case/preload editintro=Duke lacrosse case/editintro width=25 The "Duke lacrosse case" was a high-profile criminal justice case in which three white student athletes at Duke University were accused of raping an African-American exotic dancer at a party. Though the District Attorney prosecuting the case made numerous news appearances, in which he spoke strongly about the evidence pointing towards the guilt of the accused, an investigation by the Attorney General of North Carolina after the original prosecutor recused himself found "no credible evidence that an attack occurred in that house that night." and "no credible evidence to support the allegation that the crimes occurred." The prosecutor was la

owl:sameAs

dbr:Duke_lacrosse_case

dcterms:subject

n4: n7: n11: n12:

n5:wikiPageUsesTemplate

n6:

n13:wikiPageUsesTemplate

n14:

n15:abstract

You can use the box below to create new pages for this mini-wiki. preload=Duke lacrosse case/preload editintro=Duke lacrosse case/editintro width=25 The "Duke lacrosse case" was a high-profile criminal justice case in which three white student athletes at Duke University were accused of raping an African-American exotic dancer at a party. Though the District Attorney prosecuting the case made numerous news appearances, in which he spoke strongly about the evidence pointing towards the guilt of the accused, an investigation by the Attorney General of North Carolina after the original prosecutor recused himself found "no credible evidence that an attack occurred in that house that night." and "no credible evidence to support the allegation that the crimes occurred." The prosecutor was later disbarred and removed from office over his misconduct in the case, including withholding DNA evidence that was favorable to the defense and lying to both Court and Bar investigators.