This HTML5 document contains 12 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/b_TOcLNmivzQ4ojQkmRiwg==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/rm6uc8WqPRnCSE4PdyhW0Q==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/tAmfxZxJqf-FL3s-hLfFfA==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/WjyPKR_uyRU5Su1xO1Yn2A==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/GVtXLR0vG3musB_JKxB7wA==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/religion/property/
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/z-Qz81zRXbKvid-Vr8UXqQ==
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/IaV73H18-eudS9LnKAyeNQ==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/christianity/property/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/hqCR6drUr1CJBgpFF0GYqg==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Arguments for the existence of God
rdfs:comment
Arugments for the existence of God involve carefully crafted reasoning with the hope that an individual will come to the conclusion that God exists. Also known as proofs for God's existence, these arguments have not always come with full acceptance. Those opposed to natural theology claim that God's existence cannot be proven by human reason or the natural world. Viewpoints vary, but responses tend to conclude that God can only be known by supernatural revelation or Scripture alone. Karl Barth is a classic example of this as he believed that God is exclusively revealed in Jesus Christ, and Jesus is only revealed in the Bible. Proponents of natural theology vary as well, but most conclude that the existence of God can be known through human reason although it is not salvific (not a saving k Arguments for the existence of God involve carefully crafted reasoning with the hope that an individual will come to the conclusion that God exists. Also known as proofs for God's existence, these arguments have not always come with full acceptance. Those opposed to natural theology claim that God's existence cannot be proven by human reason or the natural world, and that any attempt to do so runs the risk of becoming a God of the Gaps argument. Viewpoints vary, but responses tend to conclude that God can only be known by supernatural revelation or Scripture alone. Karl Barth is a classic example of this as he believed that God is exclusively revealed in Jesus Christ, and Jesus is only revealed in the Bible. Proponents of natural theology vary as well, but most conclude that the existence
dcterms:subject
n11: n13: n14:
n7:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n8:
n4:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n5: n6: n9:
n12:abstract
Arugments for the existence of God involve carefully crafted reasoning with the hope that an individual will come to the conclusion that God exists. Also known as proofs for God's existence, these arguments have not always come with full acceptance. Those opposed to natural theology claim that God's existence cannot be proven by human reason or the natural world. Viewpoints vary, but responses tend to conclude that God can only be known by supernatural revelation or Scripture alone. Karl Barth is a classic example of this as he believed that God is exclusively revealed in Jesus Christ, and Jesus is only revealed in the Bible. Proponents of natural theology vary as well, but most conclude that the existence of God can be known through human reason although it is not salvific (not a saving knowledge of God). Thomas Aquinas is characteristic of this view, holding to the understanding that the created world reflects aspects of its creator that are apparent to all. Nonetheless, arguments for the existence of God have been formed throughout church history and continue to be used today, namely in the area of apologetics. Arguments for the existence of God involve carefully crafted reasoning with the hope that an individual will come to the conclusion that God exists. Also known as proofs for God's existence, these arguments have not always come with full acceptance. Those opposed to natural theology claim that God's existence cannot be proven by human reason or the natural world, and that any attempt to do so runs the risk of becoming a God of the Gaps argument. Viewpoints vary, but responses tend to conclude that God can only be known by supernatural revelation or Scripture alone. Karl Barth is a classic example of this as he believed that God is exclusively revealed in Jesus Christ, and Jesus is only revealed in the Bible. Proponents of natural theology vary as well, but most conclude that the existence of God can be known through human reason although it is not salvific (not a saving knowledge of God). Thomas Aquinas is characteristic of this view, holding to the understanding that the created world reflects aspects of its creator that are apparent to all. Nonetheless, arguments for the existence of God have been formed throughout church history and continue to be used today, namely in the area of apologetics. __TOC__