This HTML5 document contains 4 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Subject Item

n2:

rdfs:label

Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Declined 61

rdfs:comment

[[File:Clovertail.queen.alt2.png]] I hope this doesn't look redone x.x. Tweaked to match other images/make brown less golden and white less gray. I decided to redo the shading to make it match the queen's a wee better. Anyways, comments? Bbunlegs 22:22, April 14, 2013 (UTC) Hm... the shading seems too dark on the white and it doesn't seem like, how do I put this, fluffy enough? xD Thick seems like a better word, and there needs to be highlights. It looks strange in my opinion with out them o3o --Echo Harkness "I was just saying hello!" 23:06, April 14, 2013 (UTC)

dcterms:subject

n6:

n4:abstract

[[File:Clovertail.queen.alt2.png]] I hope this doesn't look redone x.x. Tweaked to match other images/make brown less golden and white less gray. I decided to redo the shading to make it match the queen's a wee better. Anyways, comments? Bbunlegs 22:22, April 14, 2013 (UTC) Hm... the shading seems too dark on the white and it doesn't seem like, how do I put this, fluffy enough? xD Thick seems like a better word, and there needs to be highlights. It looks strange in my opinion with out them o3o --Echo Harkness "I was just saying hello!" 23:06, April 14, 2013 (UTC) I'll fix that shading soon. Also, I don't use highlights;I prefer not to use 'em. Bbunlegs 23:09, April 14, 2013 (UTC) Pfft...I love highlights. So alone... I think there should be a bit more unshaded part on that back leg, and her right front leg looks a bit flat with no unshaded part. Maybe also blur the shading by her shoulder and hauch? Beautiful! 01:31, April 15, 2013 (UTC) I think that the shading is fine on the white, Echo. 01:33, April 15, 2013 (UTC) Re-up. Bbunlegs 16:35, April 15, 2013 (UTC) Sorry, but could you lighten the shading on the belly and neck a bit more? 03:23, April 16, 2013 (UTC) Re-up. Bbunlegs 03:31, April 16, 2013 (UTC) The shading before was fine imo, it didn't need to be redone. I agree with Paleh. It really didn't need to be redone. Okay, the more I look at this image, the more I'm inclined to believe it was tweaked more than it needed to be. The white doesn't match with the original image, and the shading is completely redone. Nothing matches, even down to the /eyes/ of the image. I have the same issue with this as I do with the rogue. It looks completely redone, and there's nothing left of the original image. Not even the pattern of the brown matches the other image anymore. If it is tweaked, then I apologize, but it doesn't sit well with me and I just don't feel it's right to stay quiet. Gah, it is redone, but I'm just a piece of failness x.x. The eyes I can easily fix though (I only redid them to match with the queen), eheh. Bbunlegs 21:23, April 17, 2013 (UTC) Per input (and based solely on the fact that this needed to be tweaked, *not* redone), it's been decided that this will be declined. Thank you for being honest, though. 21:31, April 17, 2013 (UTC)