This HTML5 document contains 53 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n21http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/upgZs64VTUzK0c_MsOY-CQ==
n49http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/pTEKXoXwy_QJD-cbbKl3EQ==
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/zJQanahaOCNOVHE5v4K6iQ==
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/daabapYm3qPAnLpmBfbegw==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Qm5tB5sWL0161j_tXmGvOA==
n29http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ttIumZHmOBn4oMAm0GiAog==
n30http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/HxcIf5e1oO51Mqppnjygcw==
n15http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/vdOpNmpk6l-22zJ0FzU5-w==
n39http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/krD_GSPHhNL2IejCI7diCQ==
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n44http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/PjxltIW8jFiDps38rfYu4w==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n35http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/iq-o6pr7dNYnEk-LP5ityQ==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n41http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/oCaeCgv1fyFIHEOWj1oovQ==
n36http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/rIpErX9kKevx6y8VvaNtpw==
n23http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/cyfZMD8mcbsH4fwXsmOb7A==
n38http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/pI0QD5JuBnLh_p21itdU8Q==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/EBTk8fB32gpdlsr7xXF73Q==
n33http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/7_dwHHF8FUA3XhGjI4-8Fw==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Z9Ne75FJnHIilWqSU-Dspg==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n37http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Z5QSbMEwkLdMOLKQ6blvPA==
n19http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/tuUkK1u79LqvAxe4i64MQg==
n45http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/A74X60Kq18n-pbrbfJvXrw==
n31http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/TgOVbXtoSofCtrjpr1F5Hw==
n16http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/MDjLyCPatogk58PB8A2TCQ==
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/OE3BF4O99l9jIVI0FdVkwg==
n22http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/PPtEcvpqmSGTimLmXlEbOA==
n24http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/cJVwmYATZVtb1Jhb4lQDCg==
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ODD2urn6xOTu5tfNx3dKHA==
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/0CKyvZkWFJ7EHgtKX8h8Vw==
n26http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/DNOZoeKM5a-Mm7V9nTUhWw==
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/CdB0d4j5t8GoUP_pdtPcIg==
n34http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ZbtrzLFw6TNwE1208cbZTA==
n32http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/qNrP0gD7UJ6wqXfoxlFnbg==
n40http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/AaGpNMKXeCEx6k1ovZIRVg==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/military/property/
n48http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/e-2xcbTE91wJ3xgnapoxAw==
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/o7X397EYO-ERVS8pEW85Ag==
n46http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/4iVQKbeutq0F4MxP3vGicQ==
n47http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/vtSKloWSl_NdPoT2l-5Nog==
n28http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/qmeZvzM_oXDBCi4saZ2JLA==
n25http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/sb8VM8utIDd1rIdGkOuRZw==
n50http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/YFnE5foOLkicIh_uAXdFBA==
n17http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/DZIyTz_PDsNObHBpcsclOA==
n20http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/CoMilzzRb33WL7XdmquQtw==
n18http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/SUyTDBKhL9AafLvBS7VmMA==
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
Subject Item
n2:
rdf:type
n39:
rdfs:label
Second Ostend Raid
rdfs:comment
The Second Ostend Raid (officially known as Operation VS) was the later of two failed attempts made during the spring of 1918 by the United Kingdom's Royal Navy to block the channels leading to the Belgian port of Ostend as a part of its conflict with the German Empire during World War I. The German Navy had used the port since 1915 as a base for their U-boat activities during the battle of the Atlantic and the strategic advantages conferred by the Belgian ports in the conflict were very important.
owl:sameAs
dbr:Second_Ostend_Raid
n3:
with aerial support four monitors, eight destroyers , Shore defences and five motor launches
dcterms:subject
n14: n18: n32: n37: n45:
n11:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n12: n16: n20: n23: n30: n33: n34: n38: n40: n41: n44: n48: n49:
n46:
2008-11-10
n17:
North Sea Operations, First World War
n5:
1918-05-09 1918-08-27
n24:
n25:
n31:
Wreck of HMS Vindictive at Ostend
n29:
30870
n8:
yes
n21:
10083
n15:
29 18 Launch ML254 sunk, 8 3
n4:
HMS Vindictive sunk in Ostend harbour but only partially blocked the canal.
n6:
n7: n19: n35: n36:
n22:
Ostend, Belgium
n28:
Second Ostend Raid
n50:
10092
n47:abstract
The Second Ostend Raid (officially known as Operation VS) was the later of two failed attempts made during the spring of 1918 by the United Kingdom's Royal Navy to block the channels leading to the Belgian port of Ostend as a part of its conflict with the German Empire during World War I. The German Navy had used the port since 1915 as a base for their U-boat activities during the battle of the Atlantic and the strategic advantages conferred by the Belgian ports in the conflict were very important. A successful blockade of these bases would force German submarines to operate out of more distant ports, such as Wilhelmshaven, on the German coast. This would expose them for longer to Allied countermeasures and reduce the time they could spend raiding. The ports of Ostend and Zeebrugge (which had been partially blocked in the Zeebrugge Raid three weeks previously) provided sea access via canals for the major inland port of Bruges. Bruges was used as a base for small warships and submarines. As it was inland, it was immune to most naval artillery fire and coastal raids, providing a safe harbour for training and repair. The Ostend Raid was largely a failure as a result of heavy German resistance and British navigational difficulties in poor weather. In anticipation of a raid, the Germans had removed the navigation buoys and without them the British had difficulty finding the narrow channel into the harbour in poor weather. When they did discover the entrance, German resistance proved too strong for the operation to be completed as originally planned: the obsolete cruiser HMS Vindictive was sunk, but only partially blocked the channel. Despite its failure, the raid was presented in Britain as a courageous and daring gamble which came very close to success. Three Victoria Crosses and numerous other gallantry medals were awarded to sailors who participated in the operation. British forces had moderate casualties in the raid, compared to minimal German losses.
Subject Item
n9:
n10:
n2:
Subject Item
n26:
n10:
n2: