This HTML5 document contains 6 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Subject Item

n2:

rdfs:label

TechWiki:Consensus

rdfs:comment

This is a Teklogs policy, When editing this page, please ensure that your revision reflects consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page. This policy has been copied from [[wikipedia:|Wikipedia]] and needs to be adopted to Teklogs. Teklogs works by building consensus. When consensus is referred to in Teklogs discussion, it always means 'within the framework of established policy and practice'. Even a majority of a limited group of editors will almost never outweigh community consensus on a wider scale, as documented within policies.

n3:wikiPageUsesTemplate

n4: n5: n8:

n7:abstract

This is a Teklogs policy, When editing this page, please ensure that your revision reflects consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page. This policy has been copied from [[wikipedia:|Wikipedia]] and needs to be adopted to Teklogs. Teklogs works by building consensus. Consensus is an inherent part of the wiki process. Consensus is typically reached as a natural product of the editing process; generally someone makes a change or addition to a page, and then everyone who reads the page has an opportunity to either leave the page as it is or change it. In essence, silence implies consent if there is adequate exposure to the community. In the case of policy pages a higher standard of participation and consensus is expected. Whether the change or addition to the page is reverted, or modified or not, any refinements or objections can be discussed on the discussion page. When there are disagreements, they are resolved through polite reasoning and cooperation. Negotiation on talk pages takes place in an attempt to develop and maintain a neutral point of view. If we find that a particular consensus happens often we write it down as a guideline, to save people the time having to discuss the same principles over and over. In the rare situations where consensus is hard to find, the dispute resolution processes provide several other ways agreed by the community, to involve independent editors and more experienced help in the discussion, and to address the problems which prevent a consensus from arising. When consensus is referred to in Teklogs discussion, it always means 'within the framework of established policy and practice'. Even a majority of a limited group of editors will almost never outweigh community consensus on a wider scale, as documented within policies.