This HTML5 document contains 13 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n15http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/DAoSi4wOx1blDgXeR_wSDg==
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/S2nxnqGe3EJJnzLsqIgH4Q==
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/bg9ze1eNdg-jvA2PiTPqkQ==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/XB49_FOJwpjjWEHZuZTDsw==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Gw-Lk2hFb1y4NrBUM9dCgg==
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/af_5AFYauOfk-NJqxVvyUw==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/creepy-pasta/property/
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/creepypasta/property/
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/jDHVxrVDT_Mgzt0JkJ3Ofw==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/PK6QEoJTup2lRh4x8IkWNw==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n17http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/EVG2AU4pD29gKKgECFfdJg==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/AYPks5I9oxs1Yu0ZBzXz1A==
n16http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/F0x8vpsuoQkpRoWFEbXovQ==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
The Story of a Disappearance and an Appearance
rdfs:comment
The letters which I now publish were sent to me recently by a person who knows me to be interested in ghost stories. There is no doubt about their authenticity. The paper on which they are written, the ink, and the whole external aspect put their date beyond the reach of question.
dcterms:subject
n4: n5: n7: n8: n15: n16:
n11:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n12: n17:
n9:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n10: n14:
n6:abstract
The letters which I now publish were sent to me recently by a person who knows me to be interested in ghost stories. There is no doubt about their authenticity. The paper on which they are written, the ink, and the whole external aspect put their date beyond the reach of question. The only point which they do not make clear is the identity of the writer. He signs with initials only, and as none of the envelopes of the letters are preserved, the surname of his correspondent - obviously a married brother - is as obscure as his own. No further preliminary explanation is needed, I think. Luckily the first letter supplies all that could be expected.