This HTML5 document contains 7 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/kP8KClggoB1Mmap_DuqCbQ==
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Qb3W_PC9ZM3vnGoPQiXorQ==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/RRZNmZc6DLecMqfJqP9Aig==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/memory-alpha/property/
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/aTAk5EIyZIYKGn9o_V7kzg==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/d2fF_l7TRDLvXT5kxGX3GA==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Memory Alpha:Perfection is not required
rdfs:comment
This may go against common sense – most people are used to seeing web pages as completed, static works that don't change (and probably don't need to change). When writing a page, you may have the urge to make sure the article is finished and polished before you post it. You need to fight that urge! It's better to have a rough, unfinished article that can be refined and revised instead of no article at all. And ultimately, this process will attain perfection, because everyone is working together towards a common goal. That goal is just a lot further off than it might seem.
dcterms:subject
n10:
n5:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n6: n7: n8:
n4:abstract
This may go against common sense – most people are used to seeing web pages as completed, static works that don't change (and probably don't need to change). When writing a page, you may have the urge to make sure the article is finished and polished before you post it. You need to fight that urge! It's better to have a rough, unfinished article that can be refined and revised instead of no article at all. The key to the lack of perfection is the opportunity for collaboration. You may only post a rough, vague skeleton of an article (or even less, and just a stub ), but that's okay, because other archivists can pitch in and add their own ideas. It's like the old cliché goes – two heads are better than one. And ultimately, this process will attain perfection, because everyone is working together towards a common goal. That goal is just a lot further off than it might seem.