This HTML5 document contains 4 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Subject Item

n2:

rdfs:label

Warriors Wiki:Charart/Membership Nominations/Warrior Unsuccessful

rdfs:comment

Sorry. I forgot there were redlines provided for her. 02:53, July 2, 2011 (UTC) I crossed out my vote. I'm not sure on Ivystripe, she definetly deserves it, but, like it has been said up there, she may not be ready. If I'm not allowed to cancel my vote, then I cast it to her becoming a warrior, but as of now, I have no vote. And one thing, it doesn't matter if she's only got one charart done, but yes, it took awhile. Mintstar This time for Africa! 17:39, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

dcterms:subject

n4:

n6:abstract

Sorry. I forgot there were redlines provided for her. 02:53, July 2, 2011 (UTC) I crossed out my vote. I'm not sure on Ivystripe, she definetly deserves it, but, like it has been said up there, she may not be ready. If I'm not allowed to cancel my vote, then I cast it to her becoming a warrior, but as of now, I have no vote. And one thing, it doesn't matter if she's only got one charart done, but yes, it took awhile. Mintstar This time for Africa! 17:39, July 2, 2011 (UTC) For some of you voting against me, you just say I'm not ready, so could you explain why? It says a valid reason for voting for or against, and it'd help to say why you think I'm not ready so I can fix it! Thanks! 22:49, July 2, 2011 (UTC) Why does the approval time of her charart matter? Some of the greatest chararts we have took a great amount of time. There are many factors that could have caused that. And, besides, great art takes time to perfect. A person can't be blamed for getting it wrong on the first try. And, everyone's first charart takes tons of time. But, the end product is beautiful. That's really all that matters. 00:03, July 4, 2011 (UTC)