This HTML5 document contains 10 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/military/property/
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/QKK-M96zfI-BSbyEkBJRzA==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/jSuFEoHjd8EIFUWk5jfkaA==
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ILsJ6nKMQGsYWtUZX8kE5g==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/8HTuOZFtZgJWQi1l6lcViA==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/AaGpNMKXeCEx6k1ovZIRVg==
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/MDjLyCPatogk58PB8A2TCQ==
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Aw24SXNtFPLfhuiaujGyLg==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Opočno Castle
rdfs:comment
The castle is now a museum and has historical interiors, with a gallery, a library, ethnographic collections, and an armoury housing weaponry from 16th to 19th centuries including oriental weapons. The collection was founded by F.G. Colloredo-Mansfeld. Under Communist rule, the Czechoslovak state took possession of Opočno castle. In 2003 the Czech courts decided to return the property to the Colloredo family, but as of 2007 the decision was reversed, although the family has appealed to the higher Courts.
owl:sameAs
dbr:Opočno_Castle
dcterms:subject
n4: n8: n9: n12:
n10:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n11: n13:
n14:abstract
The castle is now a museum and has historical interiors, with a gallery, a library, ethnographic collections, and an armoury housing weaponry from 16th to 19th centuries including oriental weapons. The collection was founded by F.G. Colloredo-Mansfeld. Under Communist rule, the Czechoslovak state took possession of Opočno castle. In 2003 the Czech courts decided to return the property to the Colloredo family, but as of 2007 the decision was reversed, although the family has appealed to the higher Courts.