This HTML5 document contains 11 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/2fiup2V2-wSsdVmd901O5A==
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/military/property/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/pFZuY3d4G8A98RB8c5iVUw==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/zzjNn8l3u03beJD8gXjUJQ==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/1DYDZTwgEHNQScVaEfWKBw==
n6http://dbpedia.org/resource/The_wrong_war,_at_the_wrong_place,_at_the_wrong_time,
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/8zk6c0jpnxLK212ptGIRmQ==
n15http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/pTEKXoXwy_QJD-cbbKl3EQ==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/AaGpNMKXeCEx6k1ovZIRVg==
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/qlXczdrF3PZ5yXNqEwtSfg==
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
The wrong war, at the wrong place, at the wrong time, and with the wrong enemy
rdfs:comment
A more complete passage of Bradley's testimony is: I am under no illusion that our present strategy of using means short of total war to achieve our ends and oppose communism is a guarantee that a world war will not be thrust upon us. But a policy of patience and determination without provoking a world war, while we improve our military power, is one which we believe we must continue to follow…. Under present circumstances, we have recommended against enlarging the war from Korea to also include Red China. The course of action often described as a limited war with Red China would increase the risk we are taking by engaging too much of our power in an area that is not the critical strategic prize. Red China is not the powerful nation seeking to dominate the world. Frankly, in the opinion of
owl:sameAs
n6:_and_with_the_wrong_enemy
dcterms:subject
n4: n7: n8: n10: n11:
n13:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n14: n15:
n12:abstract
A more complete passage of Bradley's testimony is: I am under no illusion that our present strategy of using means short of total war to achieve our ends and oppose communism is a guarantee that a world war will not be thrust upon us. But a policy of patience and determination without provoking a world war, while we improve our military power, is one which we believe we must continue to follow…. Under present circumstances, we have recommended against enlarging the war from Korea to also include Red China. The course of action often described as a limited war with Red China would increase the risk we are taking by engaging too much of our power in an area that is not the critical strategic prize. Red China is not the powerful nation seeking to dominate the world. Frankly, in the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, this strategy would involve us in the wrong war, at the wrong place, at the wrong time, and with the wrong enemy. From testimony before the Senate Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Relations, May 15, 1951.—Military Situation in the Far East, hearings, 82d Congress, 1st session, part 2, p. 732 (1951). In China, Bradley's words were misleadingly quoted. The Chinese people were told this story: "the UN forces were heavily beaten by the Chinese army and the North Korean army. Even the top US general admitted that the Korean war was 'the wrong war, at the wrong place, at the wrong time, and with the wrong enemy.'"