This HTML5 document contains 12 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/SpYfqla6fkL3Y1fhl0otVA==
n15http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/qwYq2UzEkg_vHmJXr63gjg==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/uncyclopedia/property/
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/d6UOUb-4eqx1naXm8hjscA==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/RasIwwuZ3UWsM7IjiIYBPQ==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Ivfi7E18qgdYycWPTzCZyQ==
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/i2ydhLqGWWCxMTAhmnttaA==
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/GKKbpXMoNq-KAuSKvDssVA==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/sgwF7FdocBIJ1U-n0Cvesg==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/3yEdKoldmjNRKkGfBALzmw==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/amecG44lNsVQD_pbnlfPfw==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Peter Atkins
rdfs:comment
Peter Atkins is an atheist. Yup, it's true. You heard it here first. What? You like atheists? What are you, some kind of new-age, cocky little tyke who thinks that they can disprove religion? Well that's what Peter Atkins is. He thinks he can disprove all religion. Or maybe not, maybe, because he's a member of the 'Look at me, I'm so clever, I deny religion!' sect, he'd say:
dcterms:subject
n4: n7: n8: n9: n10:
n5:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n6: n11: n12: n15:
n14:abstract
Peter Atkins is an atheist. Yup, it's true. You heard it here first. What? You like atheists? What are you, some kind of new-age, cocky little tyke who thinks that they can disprove religion? Well that's what Peter Atkins is. He thinks he can disprove all religion. Or maybe not, maybe, because he's a member of the 'Look at me, I'm so clever, I deny religion!' sect, he'd say: Or something like that. He's almost as bad as Dawkins. What? You like Dawkins to? Come on. Richard Dawkins is not actually an intelligent person. He just thinks he is. And you apparently think he is. Why? Because he's helping to eradicate the scourge of religion? THERE IS NO SCOURGE OF RELIGION. There is only people distorting religion to there own twisted ends. Admittedly it's quite easy to distort though. Oh shit, am I getting to serious...? OK fuck it onto the next section.