This HTML5 document contains 17 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/1yQJPtkYvcsCFgG3PlJ8mQ==
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/JWNc72aRGxM5cJdro2WSVQ==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/lFNTeAf4IOLhr70j31yNDA==
n18http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/K0VLLUMhMR2HmZaR7Uebjw==
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/wackypedia/property/
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/1e8vUfbfQVolpeXKDc0VPw==
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/lJnfnV9XLIqHcUJLb1SA8g==
n20http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/UBv0vQ6oCWmNc_QaljP-tA==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n17http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/FHLViwvDPRJbbe1Dm0Wp9w==
n15http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/szXVmolzhcFc7GBeBwP5MQ==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/tQUznGYVsWYVwmUDYtteug==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/wks4xCgAG--SvOr0JvvUig==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/og3YnnEiESINGa2XjbB-Eg==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n16http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/D23vawq7Nksqn0ii_5oojQ==
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/O8_1StuNCgbx_fqZUqqHsA==
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/e7j6aGsK6_egQsbJPkftOQ==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Wackypedia:Review/HowTo:Go on IRC
rdfs:comment
Ljlego 21:54, 28 Farbleum 2008 (UTC) Random idea: For additional confusion, a "noob" could first be described as a good thing to be ("Non-objectionable", perhaps?), and then suddenly things go wrong and it is bad!. 00:51, 4 Arche 2008 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
n20:
n8:
Overall, a little too un-strange, I think; weirding it up a bit would add that nonsense edge.
n16:
None, so not applicable.
n3:
A questionable guide for a sensible subject; good.
n10:
8
n5:
7
n11:
0
n15:
Just fine.
n13:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n14:
n9:
{{:User:The Divine Fluffalizer/_s
n6:
Good potential; if it were less sane, I'd vote for it for feature.
n17:
The confusion and questionableness is good, but the insulting parts are a bit too plain. Reducing harshness a bit, replacing it with nutty suggestions for self-improvement , or otherwise making them more nonsensical would serve to increase the "WTF?"-factor of the guide.
n7:
6
n18:
8
n12:abstract
Ljlego 21:54, 28 Farbleum 2008 (UTC) Random idea: For additional confusion, a "noob" could first be described as a good thing to be ("Non-objectionable", perhaps?), and then suddenly things go wrong and it is bad!. 00:51, 4 Arche 2008 (UTC)