This HTML5 document contains 4 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/qXSMg29v8_RySK1-VrFheQ==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/twpxyj6s61FoquxvQeJUtg==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Warriors Wiki talk:Books/Discussion Archive 10
rdfs:comment
Yeah, y'all know what I'm talking about. You know when you click on a book article and that shows up. Well, I noticed that two of the short stories are missing images. After Sunset: The Right Choice? and The Elders' Concern. What I was thinking, was that since AS:TRC focus around Brambleclaw, we could use that. And for TEC, we could possibly use Dappletail. So, any ideas, comments or concerns? 14:50, August 4, 2011 (UTC) Maybe for TEC, we could do a collabration of all the elders featured in the story together? (Like...er...the couple userboxes, something like that) 17:55, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
n4:
n6:abstract
Yeah, y'all know what I'm talking about. You know when you click on a book article and that shows up. Well, I noticed that two of the short stories are missing images. After Sunset: The Right Choice? and The Elders' Concern. What I was thinking, was that since AS:TRC focus around Brambleclaw, we could use that. And for TEC, we could possibly use Dappletail. So, any ideas, comments or concerns? 14:50, August 4, 2011 (UTC) Maybe for TEC, we could do a collabration of all the elders featured in the story together? (Like...er...the couple userboxes, something like that) 17:55, August 4, 2011 (UTC) That would be a good idea. Or, we could go back into the book where it supposedly takes place, and figure out which one was the most concerned about it, and place them in the template. 18:02, August 4, 2011 (UTC) Hm, yes. But I like the collabration idea better. 18:04, August 4, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, but how would we go about making an image like that? And first, we'd have to find out who was involved. I don't have the app, so I can't read it. 18:07, August 4, 2011 (UTC) I like Icestorm's idea. Anyone who has the app, please list which characters are in TEC. 08:08, August 7, 2011 (UTC) Halftail, Dappletail, Smallear, Patchpelt and One-eye are the elders. It doesn't really focus around one elder, rather all five of them together. 14:47, August 7, 2011 (UTC) Then is there a way to make an image with all of them together, AND make it look good? I may try something, but I can't promise it'll be good. 20:10, August 7, 2011 (UTC) I'll try, if you want? You're going to have to make it smaller when you insert it in the template, though. xD So could I? 19:30, August 9, 2011 (UTC) Sure Ice. Take a wack at it. I've got my hands full anyways. And for once, it's not computer related. 17:41, August 10, 2011 (UTC) You could always just take their Warrior charart and have them kind of lined up, it'd almost be like they were at the leader's call and they are looking up at the Highrock. 21:43, August 14, 2011 (UTC) Well, The Elders' Concern is kind of mainly about Fireheart, even though he doesn't actually appear, since the plot is about his deputy ceremony. I suggest using his deputy charart. 17:36, August 17, 2011 (UTC) Ah, good choice. I didn't know that, you see, because I haven't read the short story. Hmm... Maybe that's a better choice. 17:38, August 17, 2011 (UTC) So then, are we doing Fireheart's deputy charart or the other idea? I personally think we should go with Fireheart, now that I realize it's more about him then the elders. xD 18:00, August 22, 2011 (UTC) I know I haven't exactly been following the discussion, but I think we should use Firestar's deputy charart. 18:39, August 22, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, should we add it now? 18:47, August 22, 2011 (UTC) Done. 02:22, August 23, 2011 (UTC)