HTML Microdata document

This HTML5 document contains 19 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Prefix	Namespace IRI
n20	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/zQvuSUgYECkQq8wtLFi-Cw==
n15	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dcterms	http://purl.org/dc/terms/
n8	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/wGrhe_FoCqUtWSWw2zragg==
n4	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/glpQq486O70I1fGMQPUB7g==
n3	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/allthetropes/property/
n23	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/8rUqFe4PE3l_v24O_K-Feg==
n12	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/8BvduD8czJgCCnC2pADwXA==
rdfs	http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n18	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/N3GQObX7bTtrU3lJRf0y0g==
n6	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/LqbSOaAn_FHPONlA8qIZEw==
n21	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/EZBjfMDR6TnAGKqw1XJ9JQ==
n7	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/GMI9ly3RYj9L06XHDhxhiA==
n22	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/g932QSGKnI9CeCRiVdpHeQ==
n13	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/yxDn5PhafHQ-ggXyYqHwRA==
n17	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/hMqxxnqb8mftw8U1T187wA==
rdf	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/uQSCYA6pmtu_X5bvZs24Yg==
n16	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/HdqQrIRgXjb17BCuBvsdOg==
n14	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ZEKmU1FCoyLjobVxpyKZZA==
xsdh	http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n19	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/q1ZqMb4hLhxWxTExaxMaYA==
n10	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/wNFGyen-Q2lyZj-eZhoHHA==
n9	http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/all-the-tropes/property/

Subject Item: n2:
rdfs:label: Star Trek: Deep Space Nine/Headscratchers
rdfs:comment: This has been bugging me ever since I saw "A Man Alone". Some funny genetics are found amongst the skin flakes of a murder victim's room. Bashir then clones the genetics to see what it is. Fair enough. But even when he realizes it is developing into a humanoid (and a fully grown one at that), he continues the experiment until there is a fully adult clone living and walking around. Is creating a new lifeform as part of a crime investigation really all that ethical? Especially considering this person will have a drastically shortened lifespan, and will have to learn even the most basic things. Yet no one seems to even remark on this.
dcterms:subject: n6: n7: n12: n18: n19: n21: n22: n23:
n9:wikiPageUsesTemplate: n10: n14: n16: n17:
n3:wikiPageUsesTemplate: n4: n8: n13: n20:
n15:abstract: This has been bugging me ever since I saw "A Man Alone". Some funny genetics are found amongst the skin flakes of a murder victim's room. Bashir then clones the genetics to see what it is. Fair enough. But even when he realizes it is developing into a humanoid (and a fully grown one at that), he continues the experiment until there is a fully adult clone living and walking around. Is creating a new lifeform as part of a crime investigation really all that ethical? Especially considering this person will have a drastically shortened lifespan, and will have to learn even the most basic things. Yet no one seems to even remark on this. * To be more precise, he cultures the material, which then begins growing by itself. He wasn't trying to clone it, it was a self-growing clone. All he did was unintentionally give it the means to grow. Once it grew to the point that it was clearly humanoid, it would have been unethical for Bashir to just kill it out of hand.