This HTML5 document contains 9 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/speedydeletion/property/
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/AIwP6M9mKWLNPXeShB468w==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/umeeVoPxsYj1jFJSZd5vRw==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/MzRCxTUSJ-iaxoaKm29D8Q==
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/U0AkhHdVz-opGxfjZaPWfw==
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/G4qIUW8wKFQ2UnLJXakg9Q==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/yefXPU5NJ_JDCCr92OsnNQ==
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/NAXQSNOjXyS0s511Aj2IUQ==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Articles for deletion/List of toys in the Demonic Toys films
rdfs:comment
Zero sources. Zero out-of-universe notability. Does not meet any notability guideline that I know about. Delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC) * Keep – The series of Demonic Toys films are notable (Demonic T
n5:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n6: n7: n8: n9: n10: n11:
n3:abstract
Zero sources. Zero out-of-universe notability. Does not meet any notability guideline that I know about. Delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC) * Keep – The series of Demonic Toys films are notable (Demonic Toys, Dollman vs. Demonic Toys, Puppet Master vs Demonic Toys, Demonic Toys 2), and this is a very reasonable content fork of these four articles. The rationale to retain this article is based upon WP:PRESERVE, a subsection of Wikipedia's Editing policy. Outright deletion is unnecessary, and simply reduces the overall available information to the public about the films. This article would benefit from the addition of inline citations for verification using reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:30, 23 June 2012 (UTC)