This HTML5 document contains 21 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Subject Item

n2:

rdfs:label

RuneScape:Article of the Month/Fifth Age

rdfs:comment

I just finished reading this and thought "Damn, thats a good article". It is extremely informative, interesting, well laid out and organized. It follows our style guide very well, and for a few thousand bonus points it doesn't have a trivia section. That alone bumps it way up the awesome article scale. Sure it doesn't have a lot of pictures, but I think the ones it has do it justice.--Degenret01 17:06, December 16, 2009 (UTC) * Supports - 9 * Oppose - 0 Support as nominator .--Degenret01 17:06, December 16, 2009 (UTC) File:Silver sickle.png Asparagoose 04:29, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

n3:wikiPageUsesTemplate

n4: n5: n6: n7: n17: n18: n21: n22: n23:

n8:wikiPageUsesTemplate

n9: n10: n12: n13: n14: n15: n19: n20: n24:

n16:abstract

I just finished reading this and thought "Damn, thats a good article". It is extremely informative, interesting, well laid out and organized. It follows our style guide very well, and for a few thousand bonus points it doesn't have a trivia section. That alone bumps it way up the awesome article scale. Sure it doesn't have a lot of pictures, but I think the ones it has do it justice.--Degenret01 17:06, December 16, 2009 (UTC) * Supports - 9 * Oppose - 0 Support as nominator .--Degenret01 17:06, December 16, 2009 (UTC) Support - Even though I like Dragon Slayer better, anything is better than Upcoming updates. --Fruit.Smoothie 23:26, December 16, 2009 (UTC) Support - If you didn't nominate it, I probably would have. Great article. File:Unicorn horn dust.png Evil Yanks talk 00:10, December 17, 2009 (UTC) Support - Per Fruit.Smothie. This is actual RuneScape history, much better than this page... -- File:Water Wave icon.png Captain Sciz Talk • Edits • Hiscores File:Runecrafter hat.png|link= 18:28, December 18, 2009 (UTC) Support - It is very well-written. File:Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 19:12, December 20, 2009 (UTC) SupportI like it the editors have worked hard, good job! Supawilko 19:20, December 22, 2009 (UTC) Support - Written like a section of a history textbook File:Lol.gif, editors put some vigorous effort in it to be nominated. File:Fishing.png • NnK Oliver • (600613) talk 04:01, December 25, 2009 (UTC) Support - Per everyone http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv341/Rwojy/scoot4.pngscooties 01:45, December 26, 2009 (UTC) Support - Definitely one of the more informative, well-written articles on this site. File:Scythe.png Ravenhol ~ Talk File:Thieving hood.png 05:29, January 1, 2010 (UTC) Comment - Well now, this one is tricky. On the one hand, it is a good length, well-written and of course informative, but the layout irks me slightly. There's too many == of these headings == for my liking, makes the article and contents page look untidy. If some were replaced by === these ===, I might be convinced. As it happens I'm unsure. File:Silver sickle.png Asparagoose 04:29, January 2, 2010 (UTC)