This HTML5 document contains 4 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Subject Item

n2:

rdfs:label

Star Trek Expanded Universe talk:RPG directory

rdfs:comment

Challenger, Columbus and Resolution need links. --Sasorizaa1 00:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC) I know I removed the link for Columbus on 18:41, 7 July 2006 Sneg (Talk | contribs) m (→== - Removed Star Trek: Columbus link - dead link) --Sneg 01:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC) Hmm... Should defunct RPGs be listed here? Maybe there should be separate pages or sections on the same page to separate active from inactive? I realize STEU shouldn't be an actual advertising outlet, per se, but if they're going to be listed, clarifying their current status serves several benefits. --Sasorizaa1 02:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC) I wondered about that (if I should delete defunct RPGs) but felt wrong completely deleting it wholesale. That's why I only took off the dead link. --Sneg 02:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

n3:wikiPageUsesTemplate

n4:

n6:abstract

Challenger, Columbus and Resolution need links. --Sasorizaa1 00:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC) I know I removed the link for Columbus on 18:41, 7 July 2006 Sneg (Talk | contribs) m (→== - Removed Star Trek: Columbus link - dead link) --Sneg 01:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC) Hmm... Should defunct RPGs be listed here? Maybe there should be separate pages or sections on the same page to separate active from inactive? I realize STEU shouldn't be an actual advertising outlet, per se, but if they're going to be listed, clarifying their current status serves several benefits. --Sasorizaa1 02:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC) I wondered about that (if I should delete defunct RPGs) but felt wrong completely deleting it wholesale. That's why I only took off the dead link. --Sneg 02:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)