This HTML5 document contains 29 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n24http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/mNPHBf_yS46PJ1_BRjCn7A==
n32http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/nqgBGmZ7qSn0_iWNIEwiuw==
n22http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/nA9eZRXOTVX29e_HE51wLQ==
n19http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/EzhKXz6dfYo9P4FXeJILFw==
n28http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/DVIDMpWxBzlo2xQZ132B0Q==
n15http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/RjSw2e1qx9I7Pklvh_doeg==
n16http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/o80whJyZmQw-8fuRve4qNg==
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/E9b6EMgwqPbZdRp_9jFEYg==
n29http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/kYTyHAajU0hGxBrkIM14Cg==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/KfjuthJfUZhlwFK8Vsip4Q==
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/UwcO9ismyzR2adWGVCmzOw==
n31http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/MdmfQkIvoVSJrov42PdjmQ==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ZDJaGJD7eeLas_TB4VcxDg==
n30http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/xcjWtyDNiUpzlmcJgE7Nvw==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/CV7fOUT3dKpjLAM-N6u1-w==
n23http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/0RRzx7A-sxbg6v92-QiAGA==
n18http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/bNl8v71X_xtTzjCKlppkoA==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/049WPXRng-HmbPdAU4yQzg==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/qNmpHEYSaF77XLNr3Ykawg==
n26http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/d0QJYTwXIjGMesbM4_XISw==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/xyDdwlsMAIJGMNZCYDi7AQ==
n20http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/F3xqQZ5bD9c2n5NuwqyL7Q==
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/runescape/property/
n25http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/uRP_bDkcFmr9W1My-0Phew==
n21http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ZbDT9uFLmu6mMswkm0Xcew==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/K5vwhbnFTwyGpc4xRtSdbQ==
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/rune-scape/property/
n27http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/kWRYTU_hZ4YTQPgcno5b-g==
n17http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/jGggNm8vNHcVgViey0b1_w==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
RuneScape:Featured images/File:Lumbridge.png (delist)
rdfs:comment
[[File:Lumbridge.png|250x250px|right]] Reason: Obsolete, replaced with new images all over the Lumbridge Castle page, the rest are gray/ugly too. Oh, and it's not used in mainspace. Nomination: RuneScape:Featured_images/archive6#Lumbridge Closed - File:Yes check.svg The image will be deleted. Suppa chuppa Talk 02:04, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
n3:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n4: n5: n6: n8: n9: n12: n13: n14: n17: n21: n27: n28: n31:
n10:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n11: n15: n16: n18: n19: n20: n22: n23: n25: n26: n29: n30: n32:
n24:abstract
[[File:Lumbridge.png|250x250px|right]] Reason: Obsolete, replaced with new images all over the Lumbridge Castle page, the rest are gray/ugly too. Oh, and it's not used in mainspace. Nomination: RuneScape:Featured_images/archive6#Lumbridge * Support - As non-mainspace-image-keeler. 06:42, January 1, 2012 (UTC) Oh, and if this passes, I intend to delete it. 06:45, January 1, 2012 (UTC) * Support - Go ahead. Suppa chuppa Talk 06:45, January 1, 2012 (UTC) * Delist - Per those whom have their names above me, and possibly those who will take their place below me. 06:46, January 1, 2012 (UTC) * Support - Per above. Smithing (talk | contribs) 06:48, January 1, 2012 (UTC) * Support, delete, whatever you wanna do - (edit conflict x2) It's okay. File:Wink.svg 06:49, January 1, 2012 (UTC) * Support - But don't delete it. If anything, merge it with another file's history, but deleting something that used to be a FIMG for quite a while is a pity. Fswe1 10:11, January 1, 2012 (UTC) What would be the point in that when we already have duplicates of this in files histories? 02:40, January 2, 2012 (UTC) * Support, though I'd prefer a Replacement - Replacements are good. n_n File:Black cavalier detail.png Ninja DarkDoomOrb Talk File:Death.png 02:08, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Replacements are not good when the subject matter is just plain ugly. 02:40, January 2, 2012 (UTC) * Support - Grey on grey on white with a bit of green and blue File:Ring of kinship.png Ciphrius Kane File:Dungeoneering cape (t).png 02:19, January 2, 2012 (UTC) * Support - grey, grey and grey. What an interesting image. File:Small recharge gem.png AnselaJonla File:Slayer-icon.png 17:39, January 3, 2012 (UTC) * Delist - But do not delete, pls. Ronan Talk 17:40, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Then what do you want to do with it? 21:31, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Add it to the page's gallery. Ronan Talk 21:59, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Uhh, why? It's a duplicate, or rather quadruplicate. 01:05, January 4, 2012 (UTC) It's a different image. Ronan Talk 10:19, January 4, 2012 (UTC) If you look on the Lumbridge Castle page, you'll see that is not the case. 18:16, January 4, 2012 (UTC) I did look. The fact that they're of the same subject does not make it a duplicate. If you can present a valid reason as to how this image hinders readers, bogs down servers, causes glitches or problems with the wiki, etc., then it should be removed. Otherwise, as a former featured image, there is no reason for it to be deleted. Ronan Talk 19:09, January 4, 2012 (UTC) Except that it's an obsolete duplicate of File:Lumbridge Castle.png.... Just look at the file history. 19:15, January 4, 2012 (UTC) A file's history can't be used on a page. If it was just a throwaway image, it would be a different case, but as a formerly featured file it should be placed somewhere on an article. Ronan Talk 19:27, January 4, 2012 (UTC) No one looking at the page will care that the image used to be featured... 03:12, January 5, 2012 (UTC) * Apparently two people in this discussion alone do. I'm fine with it being delisted, but if you're intending to delete it please start an RfD. Ronan Talk 10:35, January 5, 2012 (UTC) * Support - Obsolete, duplicate. File:Adult chameleon (automatic).png Anurin Talk · Sign! . 12:45, January 5, 2012 (UTC) * Support and delete - Per nom left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 17:57, January 5, 2012 (UTC) * Support, delete - Not up to standards and duplicate. --クールネシトーク 13:23, January 7, 2012 (UTC) * Support, delete - It meets the requirements for a speedy deletion. Be done with it (no RfD, that would just make a lengthy process that few care about). Hofmic Talk 18:28, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Closed - File:Yes check.svg The image will be deleted. Suppa chuppa Talk 02:04, January 8, 2012 (UTC)