This HTML5 document contains 8 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ygUgTdRqO-H5pTzTyqOdNA==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/TUnzWRsSp_2ClsDuzwR62A==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/QeF_RSNCwxyDlCWZ9bB2pA==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/religion/property/
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/a_KQMDu8mJXS1MJNWXY0wQ==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Vi5Ek1BiaWJp0BWr_WAdvw==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/IyVZHgXmsDzQJc3WBskgQg==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Ernst Haeckel
rdfs:comment
Haeckel is famous for producing faked photographs showing a series of minievolutions occurring in human embryos. Noted evolutionist Stephen Gould wrote the following regarding Ernst Haeckel's work in a March 2000 issue of Natural History: Stephen Gould continues by quoting Michael Richardson of the St. George’s Hospital Medical School in London, who stated: "I know of at least fifty recent biology texts which use the drawings uncritically". Creationists have written regarding the fraudulent nature of Haeckel's work and how a prestigious German science journal published his dubious work.
dcterms:subject
n4: n5: n10: n11:
n8:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n9:
n7:abstract
Haeckel is famous for producing faked photographs showing a series of minievolutions occurring in human embryos. Noted evolutionist Stephen Gould wrote the following regarding Ernst Haeckel's work in a March 2000 issue of Natural History: Stephen Gould continues by quoting Michael Richardson of the St. George’s Hospital Medical School in London, who stated: "I know of at least fifty recent biology texts which use the drawings uncritically". Creationists have written regarding the fraudulent nature of Haeckel's work and how a prestigious German science journal published his dubious work.