"One should not confuse patent nonsense with: \n* Very poorly written articles. Poorly written articles may need a lot of work to bring them up to Memory Alpha's standards, but they are not patent nonsense. Allow them to stay in the database, list them on pages needing attention. \n* Immature fragments or stubs. Sometimes, someone might write a stub that covers the subject very poorly and seems to make little or no sense. However, it is most likely not patent nonsense. \n* Trolling. Occasionally, a Trek-hating \"troll\" will visit Memory Alpha and write insulting messages to the members. Although this is not desirable, it is not patent nonsense. Patent nonsense is generally: \n* Vandalism. Examples of vandalism generally includes what the vandal thinks are humorous messages or partially on-topic article fragments that distort the meaning of the subject. For more information, see dealing with vandalism . \n* Non-wikified articles. A good sign of patent nonsense is an article that is completely unformatted and contains no links to other pages. \n* Childish entries. Articles that are completely disorganized, are of an immature writing level, and say a lot without covering more than the basics of the subject are probably patent nonsense. \n* Completely off-topic articles. If the article has absolutely nothing to do with the title's subject, it's probably patent nonsense. (Be careful, though \u2013 sometimes this might be an innocent mistake on the author's part!)"@en . . . "Memory Alpha:Patent nonsense"@en . . . . "One should not confuse patent nonsense with: \n* Very poorly written articles. Poorly written articles may need a lot of work to bring them up to Memory Alpha's standards, but they are not patent nonsense. Allow them to stay in the database, list them on pages needing attention. \n* Immature fragments or stubs. Sometimes, someone might write a stub that covers the subject very poorly and seems to make little or no sense. However, it is most likely not patent nonsense. Patent nonsense is generally: ."@en .