"QSS and QAA"@en . . "The notion of QSS evolved as the need to \"protect\" early data from later outwriting was understood in shared timelines, originally, Ill Bethisad. Especially as the vision of a given timeline broadens to include more and more of the world, proposals are often made that only later are discovered to violate a preexisting fact. With a wiki format, this is less of a concern, yet this does allow much easier contribution to a particular timeline. In the grandfather of such online groups, the need was felt strongly, and thus was born the concept of Quod Scripsi Scripsi (or in the Elevated Tongue: \"\u038C \u03B3\u03AD\u03B3\u03C1\u03B1\u03C6\u03B1 \u03B3\u03AD\u03B3\u03C1\u03B1\u03C6\u03B1\")."@en . . . "The notion of QSS evolved as the need to \"protect\" early data from later outwriting was understood in shared timelines, originally, Ill Bethisad. Especially as the vision of a given timeline broadens to include more and more of the world, proposals are often made that only later are discovered to violate a preexisting fact. With a wiki format, this is less of a concern, yet this does allow much easier contribution to a particular timeline. In the grandfather of such online groups, the need was felt strongly, and thus was born the concept of Quod Scripsi Scripsi (or in the Elevated Tongue: \"\u038C \u03B3\u03AD\u03B3\u03C1\u03B1\u03C6\u03B1 \u03B3\u03AD\u03B3\u03C1\u03B1\u03C6\u03B1\"). In essence, this fundamental governs how canonical facts internal to a timeline are to be respected as unalterable and governs how established facts may be overturned. Even when the proponent of a fact ceases to take part in the project, his contributions shouldn't be swept away. These facts as they stand may be contested by a later idea, but have precedence by right of seniority. Any alteration to an established fact must be discussed and generally accepted before the violation of QSS is allowed as canonical. A corollary to QSS is the notion of QAA: Quod Assumpsi Assumpsi. It is defined as the \"degree by which assumed information about unclaimed territories with no direct importance to anyone's work is protected.\" This principle works hand in hand with QSS, but is thought of more as the yin to QSS's yang: QSS deals especially with Member generated data, while QAA deals more with real world data that is applied to a timeline. While the latter is much more easily changed, it can not be whimsically waved away -- changes to QAA must also be made with care, as even those facts may impinge upon the work of others."@en . .