. . "Editorial Guidelines (1983: Doomsday)"@en . "This ATL evolved from a short TL written by 70.150.208.34, the concurrent adoption by Xi'Reney, and later the (fictional) WCRB. So this is a basically open timeline; new content and edits are always welcome. But as the complexity of the timeline has rapidly increased new content will NOT automatically become \"canon\". New edits will have to be reviewed/harmonized/canonized to keep everything logical. To avoid some of these problems it is highly recommended that you read the timeline. A Few Examples: \n* Nordic Union \n* Hawaii \n* Celtic Alliance \n* Victoria \n* South Florida"@en . . . . "This ATL evolved from a short TL written by 70.150.208.34, the concurrent adoption by Xi'Reney, and later the (fictional) WCRB. So this is a basically open timeline; new content and edits are always welcome. But as the complexity of the timeline has rapidly increased new content will NOT automatically become \"canon\". New edits will have to be reviewed/harmonized/canonized to keep everything logical. Content which has already been accepted by the group as canon and has remained unchanged in the alternate history will have precedence over any proposed new changes. This does not mean you will be barred from making said changes if it is more plausible to update the content of the TL, but it is recommended you bring it to the group's attention at Talk:1983: Doomsday, which is the main page for discussion on the alternate history. To avoid some of these problems it is highly recommended that you read the timeline. With DD constantly growing, it has proved ideal to let the regional/national details be worked out by users specialized in the history of those regions. The results can be seen in some brilliant articles within this ATL. A Few Examples: \n* Nordic Union \n* Hawaii \n* Celtic Alliance \n* Victoria \n* South Florida For further understanding of the idea of canon, proposals, and probability read QSS and QAA."@en . . . . . . . . . .