. . . . . . . "The following system is used by the \"Version 1.0 Editorial Team\" for assessing how close we are to a distribution-quality article on a particular topic. The system is based on a letter scheme which reflects principally how factually complete the article is, though the content and language quality are also factors. Once an article reaches the A-ClassFile:Symbol a class.png, it is considered \"complete\", although edits will continue to be made. Two levels, GA and FA, are assessments made by external panels, rather than by Wikiprojects. Candidates are nominated by listing them at Good article candidates and Featured article candidates. Judgments are made according to the criteria at What is a good article? and Featured article criteria, and the results are listed at Good articles and Featured articles. It is vital that people do not take these assessments personally. It is understood that we each have our own opinions of the priorities of the objective criteria for a perfect article. Generally an active project will develop a consensus, though be aware that different projects may use their own variation of the criteria more tuned for the subject area, such as this. Many projects have an . If you contribute a lot of content to an article you may request an independent assessment."@en . . . . . "Resident Evil Wiki:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment"@en . . . "The following system is used by the \"Version 1.0 Editorial Team\" for assessing how close we are to a distribution-quality article on a particular topic. The system is based on a letter scheme which reflects principally how factually complete the article is, though the content and language quality are also factors. Once an article reaches the A-ClassFile:Symbol a class.png, it is considered \"complete\", although edits will continue to be made."@en . .