. . . . "WoWWiki talk:Voting policy/Archive02"@en . "I think a policy vote should be in a different category than non-policy voting such as deletion and so on. This way (or even in status quo) we can have a link in the sidebar for the list of votes. There are so many votes going on, and I have no idea what they are. Also, maybe we could have a user-maintained page that lists several high-profile votes, very abbreviated proposals, and what it means to the community. Any other ideas? Schmidt 08:11, 13 June 2006 (EDT) I'll think on that one for a bit before I chip in with my .02File:Silver.png. Just one thing though: Deletion votes already live in their own category. --Mikk 08:47, 13 June 2006 (EDT) Ok, that was quick. No, I don't see the point in separating regular votes from policy votes. There just aren't that many. (See ). However, I agree with your idea of listing them + oneliner summaries somewhere. I'd suggest a new full-page wide box below the community portal. (On a sidenote, I've also been considering automating Village pump talk topic summaries there, but I need a working Linux box somewhere to run the script on. Mine is on the blink and I cba to fix it right now.) --Mikk 08:55, 13 June 2006 (EDT) (Call me restless) I created a sample page that could be included in a box in the community portal. See WoWWiki:Community_Portal/Democracy --Mikk 09:26, 13 June 2006 (EDT) Thanks. Good job. This works for what I was talking about. See, I miss so many policy votes it's not funny. Schmidt 11:47, 13 June 2006 (EDT) Heh, and here I was wondering why I never see you voting for or against policies :-) Anyway, I linked it into the community portal now. --Mikk 12:07, 13 June 2006 (EDT)"@en . . "I think a policy vote should be in a different category than non-policy voting such as deletion and so on. This way (or even in status quo) we can have a link in the sidebar for the list of votes. There are so many votes going on, and I have no idea what they are. Also, maybe we could have a user-maintained page that lists several high-profile votes, very abbreviated proposals, and what it means to the community. Any other ideas? Schmidt 08:11, 13 June 2006 (EDT)"@en . . . .