"330mm/50 Mod\u00E8le 1931 gun"@en . "2436.0"^^ . "Main guns of the"@en . "separate charges and shell"@en . "The 330mm/50 Mod\u00E8le 1931 gun was a heavy naval gun of the French Navy. The built-up gun was carried by the Dunkerque-class fast battleships, in quadruple turrets inspired by those intended for the Normandie class. They had one of the longest range, while firing quite powerful projectiles: APC - 1,235 lbs. (560 kg) and HE - 1,151 lbs. (552 kg). The range was over 40 km in both cases, the trajectory was flat. Dunkerque's guns were affected by inaccuracy caused by their quadruple mounts (too close together), but could engage German battleships of the Scharnhorst class with enough power to pierce their armour: at 0 metres, the shell could pierce 28.08 in (713 mm), at 25.153 yards (23 km) penetration capability was 13.46 in (342 mm) and 292 mm at 30.114 yds/27,500 m. Theoretically, it could pie"@en . "1.5"^^ . "France"@en . "330"^^ . . . . "APC - 44.7 lbs. ; HE - 140 lbs."@en . . "YES"@en . . . . . . "France"@en . . "YES"@en . "Naval gun"@en . . "The 330mm/50 Mod\u00E8le 1931 gun was a heavy naval gun of the French Navy. The built-up gun was carried by the Dunkerque-class fast battleships, in quadruple turrets inspired by those intended for the Normandie class. They had one of the longest range, while firing quite powerful projectiles: APC - 1,235 lbs. (560 kg) and HE - 1,151 lbs. (552 kg). The range was over 40 km in both cases, the trajectory was flat. Dunkerque's guns were affected by inaccuracy caused by their quadruple mounts (too close together), but could engage German battleships of the Scharnhorst class with enough power to pierce their armour: at 0 metres, the shell could pierce 28.08 in (713 mm), at 25.153 yards (23 km) penetration capability was 13.46 in (342 mm) and 292 mm at 30.114 yds/27,500 m. Theoretically, it could pierce Scharnhorst's 320 mm belt at over 20 km. Given the flat trajectory, the deck perforation was less impressive, but still 105 mm at 23 km and 110 mm at 27.5 km. Therefore, the armour piercing capability was very near that of the best battleship guns, at least at medium to short range. The armour piercing capability of Scharnhorst's guns varied from 604 to 205 mm in the same range (0-27,5 km), so they were weaker weapons. However, Dunkerque had a weaker armour belt, so the deadly range of the German battleships was not inferior. The battleship Strasbourg had thicker armour (283 vs. 241 mm) and this reduced the useful range to only about 18 km. The deck perforation was always in favour of the 330mm gun, the 280 mm gun being unable to pierce more than 76 mm at 27.5 km. The 330 mm guns had many faults. They were complex and moved with a weak system for such 1,473 tons (1,497 mt) turrets (roughly the weigh of an Italian 381 mm triple turret). They had two 100 hp engines (but only one was typically used). Despite the great range, elevation was only 35\u00B0 (therefore the gun had a very high muzzle velocity of 870 mps). The guns were coupled in two twin arrangement, sleeved in pairs. The turrets were heavily protected, and internally had a 25\u201340 mm bulkhead to separate the two twin mounts. This was important at Mers-El-K\u00E9bir, where a 381 mm shell hit Dunkerque in one of her turrets: the projectile penetrated the roof and killed everyone in the semi-turret, but the other pair of guns continued to operate. The later 380mm/45 Mod\u00E8le 1935 gun essentially enlarged the design."@en . "YES"@en . .