This HTML5 document contains 19 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n16http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n15http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/1yQJPtkYvcsCFgG3PlJ8mQ==
n20http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/lFNTeAf4IOLhr70j31yNDA==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/prhgxeUhy4E5UvAZlu3Wow==
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/uncyclopedia/property/
n21http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ecBfmBSLpzUHbRmxpGH2Aw==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/AT99kDAmIdhRRZ4jvauTYg==
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/szXVmolzhcFc7GBeBwP5MQ==
n18http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/7Dt_rgaw2t7XQEm6nHDk5A==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/og3YnnEiESINGa2XjbB-Eg==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/lqYxH1W4M25wiX4byCdL9g==
n17http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/wks4xCgAG--SvOr0JvvUig==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/JemlzqxLoJd74wdh-FCRCQ==
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/D23vawq7Nksqn0ii_5oojQ==
n22http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/O8_1StuNCgbx_fqZUqqHsA==
n19http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/e7j6aGsK6_egQsbJPkftOQ==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/yFN67gnsWPKFr390CT1mxA==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/CjSKFB4baJ44N7ZaSKbdQw==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/gLIUuelraL4sAPsdGPfbhQ==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Aztec
rdfs:comment
Elevator from Ipanema 03:35, November 17, 2011 (UTC) This is my first review and I hope it is satisfactory! Cool I Get A Signature 17:55, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
n13:
n15:
I enjoyed reading this article and therefore decided to let you know in a box.
n7:
I did not notice very many grammatical mistakes although considering my record at this sort of thing I wouldn't ask me! If you are not sure if you can proofread or you are too lazy ask the dedicated proofreaders to do it and add on the page. The Formatting was good as well although again this is not my area of expertise. As always more experienced people are being forced are happy to help you with formatting and HTML Coding
n8:
Those images are great and used to a high comedic value I want to plug that later one for one of my articles. Captionig could improve slightly and the link on one of the pictures is missing.
n14:
7
n22:
The concept is good if i wrote the article this is nearly how I would have thought about going through it. To improve it i would mabye add a section about daily life of the aztecs or food something just to take it away from the predicatable mindless violence. Also I would have done it more in the style of a bad documentary but that is purely my preferance
n19:
7
n20:
7
n11:
I thought it was funny at the start and I would have enjoyed it more if there had been some variation in it as to the end it was becoming stale and predictable. At times there was to much information and not enough humour. None of the jokes really stood out from other articles I have seen. Your spanish part really dragged out the page and it could have very funny if you just cut it down for instance the bit about them coming back for the gold was very funny but it was in amongst too much fact. Nobody likes a stub but nobody likes wikipedia. The smaller sections at the end about calendars and sport were quite amusing and besides from the start were the highlight of the page.
n9:
9
n5:
6
n6:
Please put a section on my talk page if you need anything else from me. I enjoyed reading and reviewing this article.
n3:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n4: n18: n21:
n17:
--11-20
n16:abstract
Elevator from Ipanema 03:35, November 17, 2011 (UTC) This is my first review and I hope it is satisfactory! Cool I Get A Signature 17:55, November 20, 2011 (UTC)